In Matter of Villani

690 S.E.2d 614, 286 Ga. 621, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 530, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 189
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 1, 2010
DocketS10Y0353
StatusPublished

This text of 690 S.E.2d 614 (In Matter of Villani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Matter of Villani, 690 S.E.2d 614, 286 Ga. 621, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 530, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 189 (Ga. 2010).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Ralph James Villani’s petition for voluntary discipline, in which he seeks the imposition of a Review Panel reprimand for his admitted violations of Rules 1.4 and 1.5 (a) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum penalty for a violation of either rule is a public reprimand. The State Bar has filed a response stating that the interests of the public and the Bar would be best served by accepting the petition.

In the petition, Villani admits that a client hired him in August 2007 to advise her concerning the death of her son, that he failed to timely and properly respond to the client’s inquiries about the matter, and that the client discharged him in December 2007. The client paid Villani $15,000 during the representation. The client requested an accounting of Villani’s professional services and a refund of fees. Villani provided a billing statement, but the client disputed it and continued to request at least a partial refund. Villani did not return any fees and the client filed a fee arbitration petition with the State Bar. In November 2008 the fee arbitration panel *622 awarded the client $6,500 and Villani refunded that sum to the client. Villani admits that the fee he charged the client was unreasonable given the relevant factors. In mitigation, Villani states that he has cooperated with the State Bar in submitting this petition for voluntary discipline; that he is sincerely remorseful for his disciplinary rule violations and accepts responsibility for his misconduct; that he has no other disciplinary record aside from an Investigative Panel reprimand administered on May 11, 2001; and that he refunded the amount awarded the client by the fee arbitration panel.

Decided March 1, 2010. Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jonathan W. Hewett, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. Edwin Marger, for Villani.

Having reviewed the record, the Court concludes that Villani violated Rules 1.4 and 1.5 (a) and finds that a Review Panel reprimand is the appropriate sanction for Villani’s conduct. Accordingly, this Court hereby accepts Villani’s petition and orders that Ralph James Villani receive a Review Panel reprimand in accordance with Bar Rules 4-102 (b) (4) and 4-220.

Review Panel reprimand.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Auto Property & Casualty Co. v. Matty
690 S.E.2d 614 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
690 S.E.2d 614, 286 Ga. 621, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 530, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-villani-ga-2010.