In Matter of Santellian

California Court of Appeal

In Matter of Santellian

24 P.2d 919, 134 Cal. App. 784, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 150

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 26, 1933

DocketDocket No. 1758.

StatusPublished

This text of 24 P.2d 919 (In Matter of Santellian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Matter of Santellian, 24 P.2d 919, 134 Cal. App. 784, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 150 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASES. [1] This is a proceeding in habeas corpus, whereby the petitioner Pastor Santellian seeks to be discharged from the custody of the sheriff of Contra Costa County, after commitment issued pursuant to a judgment of contempt for refusing to testify as a witness for the prosecution in a criminal case then on trial in the superior court in and for said county, upon the ground that his answers to the questions would tend to incriminate him. It is a companion proceeding to one numbered 1759, this day decided (ante, p. 54 [24 P.2d 916]), entitled, In theMatter of the Petition of Eugenia Sales for a Writ of HabeasCorpus. All of the facts and circumstances involved in the present proceeding are set forth and considered in *Page 785 the opinion filed therein; and for the reasons and upon the grounds there stated it is ordered that so far as the commitment here involved is concerned, the petitioner be and he is hereby discharged from custody.

Tyler, P.J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM CASES. [1] This is a proceeding in habeas corpus, whereby the petitioner Pastor Santellian seeks to be discharged from the custody of the sheriff of Contra Costa County, after commitment issued pursuant to a judgment of contempt for refusing to testify as a witness for the prosecution in a criminal case then on trial in the superior court in and for said county, upon the ground that his answers to the questions would tend to incriminate him. It is a companion proceeding to one numbered 1759, this day decided (ante, p. 54 [24 P.2d 916]), entitled, In theMatter of the Petition of Eugenia Sales for a Writ of HabeasCorpus. All of the facts and circumstances involved in the present proceeding are set forth and considered in *Page 785 the opinion filed therein; and for the reasons and upon the grounds there stated it is ordered that so far as the commitment here involved is concerned, the petitioner be and he is hereby discharged from custody.

Tyler, P.J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 P.2d 919, 134 Cal. App. 784, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-santellian-calctapp-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack