In Matter of Palmer
40 N.Y. 561
Opinion
That the act was applicable to pending appeals, and was not unconstitutional. The appeal must be. dismissed.
Ohmies JS. Miller, for the motion.
Richard O’Gorman (corporation counsel), opposed'..
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Matter of Palmer, 40 N.Y. 561 (N.Y. 1869).
40 N.Y. 561 (In Matter of Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peace v. . Wilson
79 N.E. 329 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Livingston v. . Livingston
66 N.E. 123 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Olmstead v. Town of Pound Ridge
24 N.Y.S. 615 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Devlin v. Mayor
23 N.Y.S. 888 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
Baker v. Codding
23 N.Y.S. 5 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
Wallace v. Feely
10 Daly 331 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1882)
Newark Savings Institution v. Forman
33 N.J. Eq. 436 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1881)
Dubois v. City of Kingston
27 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 500 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
In re Agnew
11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 435 (New York Supreme Court, 1875)
Matter of Petition of Ferdinand Mayer
50 N.Y. 504 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Lewenthal v. Mayor of the City of New York
61 Barb. 511 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)