In Matter of Ia
This text of 197 P.3d 623 (In Matter of Ia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of I.A., Alleged to be a Mentally III Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
I.A., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
James A. Palmer, Eugene, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder, is dangerous to others, and is unable to provide for her personal needs. On appeal, appellant argues, among other things, that the trial court erred in failing to give her the advice of rights required by ORS 426.100. The state concedes that the court's failure to advise appellant of her rights requires reversal under the circumstances of this case. We agree and accept the state's concession. See State v. Ritzman, 192 Or.App. 296, 84 P.3d 1129 (2004). Given our disposition, we need not reach appellant's other assignments of error.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 P.3d 623, 224 Or. App. 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-ia-orctapp-2008.