In Matter of Harkins

California Court of Appeal

In Matter of Harkins

3 P.2d 324, 116 Cal. App. 769, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 410

California Court of Appeal·Decided September 19, 1931·No. Docket No. 1644.·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASE. THE COURT.

[1] It is the claim of the petitioner that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. The petitioner has presented no transcript of the testimony. The writ is denied under the authority of In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal.App. 368 [205 P. 72], and Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [297 P. 566]. *Page 770

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM CASE. THE COURT.

[1] It is the claim of the petitioner that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. The petitioner has presented no transcript of the testimony. The writ is denied under the authority of In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal.App. 368 [205 P. 72], and Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [297 P. 566]. *Page 770

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

*Page 1

In Matter of Harkins, 3 P.2d 324, 116 Cal. App. 769, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 410 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

3 P.2d 324 (In Matter of Harkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related