Home/California Court of Appeal/In Matter of Harkins

In Matter of Harkins

3 P.2d 324, 116 Cal. App. 769, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 410
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 19, 1931
DocketDocket No. 1644.
StatusPublished

This text of 3 P.2d 324 (In Matter of Harkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Matter of Harkins, 3 P.2d 324, 116 Cal. App. 769, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 410 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASE.
THE COURT.

[1] It is the claim of the petitioner that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. The petitioner has presented no transcript of the testimony. The writ is denied under the authority of In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal.App. 368 [205 P. 72], and Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [297 P. 566]. *Page 770

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brune v. Superior Court
297 P. 566 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
In Re Rasmusssen
205 P. 72 (California Court of Appeal, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 P.2d 324, 116 Cal. App. 769, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-harkins-calctapp-1931.