in Matter of Galina Ross v. Ross
This text of 90 A.D.3d 669 (in Matter of Galina Ross v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Family Court reasonably found that the father has the ability to pay child support in the sum of $716.32 per month {see Family Ct Act § 413). “A support magistrate is afforded considerable discretion in determining whether to impute income to a parent” (Matter of Julianska v Majewski, 78 AD3d 1182, 1183 [2010]), and we accord deference to a support magistrate’s credibility determinations (see Matter of Feng Lucy [670]*670Luo v Yang, 89 AD3d 946, 947 [2d Dept 2011]; Matter of Tsarova v Tsarov, 59 AD3d 632, 633 [2009]). Here, the Support Magistrate’s findings regarding the father’s income, which were based on credibility determinations, are supported by the record. Accordingly, they should not be disturbed (see Matter of Gebaide v McGoldrick, 74 AD3d 966, 967 [2010]; Matter of Kennedy v Ventimiglia, 73 AD3d 1066 [2010]).
The father’s remaining contentions either are without merit or refer to matter dehors the record. Florio, J.E, Hall, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.3d 669, 933 N.Y.2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-galina-ross-v-ross-nyappdiv-2011.