In Matter of Estate of Baker

Hawaii Supreme Court

In Matter of Estate of Baker

34 Haw. 476, 1938 Haw. LEXIS 33

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 23, 1938

DocketNo. 2295.

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Haw. 476 (In Matter of Estate of Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Matter of Estate of Baker, 34 Haw. 476, 1938 Haw. LEXIS 33 (haw 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On application of appellants for a rehearing the court has reopened the above case and reconsidered that portion of the former opinion filed herein, ante, p. 263, which holds that “The report and findings of the master constituted a prima facie showing of the correctness of the items in issue.” At the rehearing the question was argued and written memoranda of authorities submitted. Nothing has been presented which causes us to doubt the correctness of our views heretofore expressed or to warrant us in receding from our former opinion.

*477 H. Irwin of the firm of Irwin & Earlocher for appel- lants. M. E. Ashford for appellee, appeared but did not argue.

The opinion heretofore filed herein will therefore he adhered to and the canse will accordingly be remanded to the circuit court and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On application of appellants for a rehearing the court has reopened the above case and reconsidered that portion of the former opinion filed herein, ante, p. 263, which holds that “The report and findings of the master constituted a prima facie showing of the correctness of the items in issue.” At the rehearing the question was argued and written memoranda of authorities submitted. Nothing has been presented which causes us to doubt the correctness of our views heretofore expressed or to warrant us in receding from our former opinion.

*477 H. Irwin of the firm of Irwin & Earlocher for appel- lants. M. E. Ashford for appellee, appeared but did not argue.

The opinion heretofore filed herein will therefore he adhered to and the canse will accordingly be remanded to the circuit court and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Haw. 476, 1938 Haw. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-estate-of-baker-haw-1938.