In Matter of Crouch

221 S.E.2d 74, 28 N.C. App. 354, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2689
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided January 7, 1976·No. 7527DC644·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

MARTIN, Judge.

While it is clear from the record that the commitment period of ninety days has expired, this appeal is not moot. See In re Carter, 25 N.C. App. 442, 213 S.E. 2d 409 (1975), and In re Mostella, 25 N.C. App. 666, 215 S.E. 2d 790 (1975).

G.S. 122-58.7(i) provides: “To support a commitment order, the court is required to find, by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, that the respondent is mentally ill or inebriate, and imminently dangerous to himself or others. The court shall record the facts which support its findings. (Emphasis added.)” In this case the commitment order is erroneous on its face since it fails to record the facts which support its findings as required by statute.

For the reasons stated, the order appealed from is

Reversed.

Judges Morris and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Matter of Crouch, 221 S.E.2d 74, 28 N.C. App. 354, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2689 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976).

221 S.E.2d 74 (In Matter of Crouch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re: B.S.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022
Matter of Monroe
270 S.E.2d 537 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
In re Caver
252 S.E.2d 284 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Matter of Jacobs
248 S.E.2d 448 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
In Matter of Koyi
238 S.E.2d 153 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Matter of Hogan
232 S.E.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)