In Matter of Brousseau

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

In Matter of Brousseau

665 A.2d 35, 1995 R.I. LEXIS 221, 1995 WL 581103

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedSeptember 21, 1995

DocketNo. 95-528 M.P.

StatusPublished

This text of 665 A.2d 35 (In Matter of Brousseau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Matter of Brousseau, 665 A.2d 35, 1995 R.I. LEXIS 221, 1995 WL 581103 (R.I. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On July 17,1995, Chief Disciplinary Counsel filed with this Court a Petition for Interim Suspension which avers that the Respondent has engaged in serious professional misconduct. This matter came on for hearing before the Court at its conference on July 27, 1995 and September 15, 1995. Respondent was represented by counsel. After hearing the arguments of counsel, we deem that an order granting the Petition for Interim Suspension is appropriate.

Accordingly, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that Respondent, Robert R. Brous-seau, be and he hereby is suspended from engaging in the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

It is further ordered that David D. Curtin, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, be appointed as Special Master to take possession of all Respondent’s client files and client accounts, to inventory them, and to take whatever steps are necessary to protect the clients’ interest. David D. Curtin, Chief Disciplinary Counsel is further empowered to enter upon Respondent’s office premises in order to effectuate this Order.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On July 17,1995, Chief Disciplinary Counsel filed with this Court a Petition for Interim Suspension which avers that the Respondent has engaged in serious professional misconduct. This matter came on for hearing before the Court at its conference on July 27, 1995 and September 15, 1995. Respondent was represented by counsel. After hearing the arguments of counsel, we deem that an order granting the Petition for Interim Suspension is appropriate.

Accordingly, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that Respondent, Robert R. Brous-seau, be and he hereby is suspended from engaging in the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

It is further ordered that David D. Curtin, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, be appointed as Special Master to take possession of all Respondent’s client files and client accounts, to inventory them, and to take whatever steps are necessary to protect the clients’ interest. David D. Curtin, Chief Disciplinary Counsel is further empowered to enter upon Respondent’s office premises in order to effectuate this Order.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

665 A.2d 35, 1995 R.I. LEXIS 221, 1995 WL 581103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-brousseau-ri-1995.