In Matter of Barron

271 S.E.2d 474, 246 Ga. 327, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 1127
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 10, 1980
DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary 108
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 271 S.E.2d 474 (In Matter of Barron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Matter of Barron, 271 S.E.2d 474, 246 Ga. 327, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 1127 (Ga. 1980).

Opinion

Per curiam.

Nancy E. Barron was charged with violating Standard 65 of Rule 4-102 in Part IV (Discipline) of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia, which provides: “A lawyer shall not commingle his client’s funds with his own and shall not fail to account for trust property, including money and interest paid on the client’s money, if any, held in any fiduciary capacity. A violation of this standard may be punished by disbarment.” (241 Ga. at 741)

The special master found that Ms. Barron had borrowed from her escrow account settlement proceeds in the amount of $7,209.16 belonging to her client, and was unable to pay those funds to the client in February, 1979, upon the client’s request. The State Bar of Georgia filed its complaint against Ms. Barron in February, 1979, and the funds were paid to the client by two checks in April and August of 1979.

The master found as extenuating facts and circumstances that Ms. Barron is a single parent mother having custody of her three minor children and having full responsibility for support of her children and herself; that she is divorced from the father of the children, his whereabouts were unknown and he was not providing for the support of his children; that at the time she made personal use of the client’s funds she was under extreme financial distress, she had undergone a serious surgical operation, she went through a very irrational period following the surgery, did not function the way she normally would, was out of work for about three months, and was unable to arrange to borrow money. The master found that she used the client’s money with the full intention of repaying it before the client’s discharge in bankruptcy took effect; that she made restitution by selling her home and certain family heirlooms; and that she no longer is practicing law and has taken employment with the federal government in which she does not function as an attorney.

Because of the substantial extenuating circumstances, the Special Master recommended discipline in the form of suspension from membership in the State Bar of Géorgia for a period of not less than two years, subject to the right to petition for reinstatement after the expiration of the two-year period. The State Disciplinary Board adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Special Master and recommended as discipline suspension for two years.

The recommendation of the Board is approved and adopted. It is ordered that Ms. Nancy E. Barron be suspended from membership in the State Bar of Georgia for a period of two years, subject to the *328 right to petition for reinstatement after expiration of the two year period.

Decided September 10, 1980. Omer W. Franklin, Jr., General Counsel State Bar, Viola L. Sellers, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. Rees R. Smith, for Barron.

It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan, P.J., who concurs in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Haupt
297 S.E.2d 284 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
In the Matter of Dowdy
277 S.E.2d 36 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 S.E.2d 474, 246 Ga. 327, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-barron-ga-1980.