In Matter of Ansley

245 S.E.2d 657, 241 Ga. 394, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 965
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1978
DocketState Bar Docket 2
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 245 S.E.2d 657 (In Matter of Ansley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Matter of Ansley, 245 S.E.2d 657, 241 Ga. 394, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 965 (Ga. 1978).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The report and recommendation of the State Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of Georgia having been filed with this court on March 31, 1978, recommending that the application of Benjamin Hugh Ansley for reinstatement to membership in the State Bar of Georgia and to the practice of law be denied; and

Respondent Ansley having filed exceptions thereto within 20 days, and the assistant general counsel of the State Bar of Georgia having filed a response to respondent’s exceptions, all as allowed by Rule 4-302 and Rule 4-219 in Part IV, Rules and Regulations for the Organization and Government of the State Bar of Georgia, 238 Ga. 739 et seq.; and

The foregoing documents together with the entire record of the proceedings having been considered;

This court finds as follows:

The following findings of the State Disciplinary Board are supported by some evidence in the record and are therefore conclusive under Rule 4-219, supra:

*395 Decided June 9, 1978. Garvis Sams, for State Disciplinary Board. Donald B. Hanna, for Ansley.

1. Respondent has not proved that the seriousness of his 1970 conviction of bribery has been offset by a sufficiently long term of rehabilitation, despite the fact that he has received a pardon as a first offender, and despite the fact that the board itself found his efforts at rehabilitation commendable;

2. From 1970 to 1977 respondent engaged in occupations which precluded his remaining current in the law; and

3. Respondent’s period of service, beginning in 1977, as a law assistant in the law office of a member of the bar has been too short to demonstrate his ability to cope with the stresses of an active practice.

Therefore, the State Disciplinary Board having correctly found and applied the law governing applications for readmission; and

Respondent’s exceptions having shown no valid reason why the board’s report and recommendation should not bo implemented,

It is ordered that the petition of Benjamin Hugh Ansley for Reinstatement to Membership in the State Bar of Georgia be, and it is hereby, denied.

It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grievance Administrator v. August
475 N.W.2d 256 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1991)
In the Matter of Klepak
302 S.E.2d 356 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
In the Matter of Reed
285 S.E.2d 726 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
In re Nichols
282 S.E.2d 341 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
In Re: Brown
273 S.E.2d 567 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1980)
In the Matter of Johnson
259 S.E.2d 57 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 S.E.2d 657, 241 Ga. 394, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-matter-of-ansley-ga-1978.