in Interest of S.L.M. AKA B.G.A.A, Child

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 25, 2011·No. 14-11-00578-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 25, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00578-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.L.M. AKA B.G.A.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from 314th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-08311J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a decree of termination signed June 7, 2011. On June 14, 2011, the trial court granted appellant’s motion for new trial.

A trial court has plenary power over its judgment until it becomes final. Fruehauf Corp. v. Carrillo, 848 S.W.2d 83, 84 (Tex. 1993). The trial court also retains continuing control over interlocutory orders and has the power to set those orders aside any time before a final judgment is entered. Id. An order granting a new trial is an unappealable, interlocutory order. Id.

On October 4, 2011, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Interest of S.L.M. AKA B.G.A.A, Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in Interest of S.L.M. AKA B.G.A.A, Child (in Interest of S.L.M. AKA B.G.A.A, Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fruehauf Corp. v. Carrillo
848 S.W.2d 83 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)