In Interest of M. H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In Interest of M. H. v. State

280 So. 2d 699, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7885

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1973·No. No. 72-1428·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was adjudicated delinquent and seeks reversal of his adjudication on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt. We have carefully considered the briefs and argument of counsel in the light of the record on appeal and have concluded that there was sufficient competent evidence before the court to support the adjudication and to [700] overcome the hypothesis of innocence. See Carr v. State, 45 Fla. 11, 34 So. 892 (1903) and Betancourt v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 124. Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was adjudicated delinquent and seeks reversal of his adjudication on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt. We have carefully considered the briefs and argument of counsel in the light of the record on appeal and have concluded that there was sufficient competent evidence before the court to support the adjudication and to [700] overcome the hypothesis of innocence. See Carr v. State, 45 Fla. 11, 34 So. 892 (1903) and Betancourt v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 124. Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed.

Affirmed.

In Interest of M. H. v. State, 280 So. 2d 699, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

280 So. 2d 699 (In Interest of M. H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related