In Interest of M. H. v. State

280 So. 2d 699, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7885
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 24, 1973
DocketNo. 72-1428
StatusPublished

This text of 280 So. 2d 699 (In Interest of M. H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Interest of M. H. v. State, 280 So. 2d 699, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was adjudicated delinquent and seeks reversal of his adjudication on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt. We have carefully considered the briefs and argument of counsel in the light of the record on appeal and have concluded that there was sufficient competent evidence before the court to support the adjudication and to [700]*700overcome the hypothesis of innocence. See Carr v. State, 45 Fla. 11, 34 So. 892 (1903) and Betancourt v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 124. Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Betancourt v. State
228 So. 2d 124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Carr v. State
45 Fla. 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 So. 2d 699, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-interest-of-m-h-v-state-fladistctapp-1973.