In Interest of CK

601 So. 2d 1331, 1992 WL 157482
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 1992
Docket91-03524
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 601 So. 2d 1331 (In Interest of CK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Interest of CK, 601 So. 2d 1331, 1992 WL 157482 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

601 So.2d 1331 (1992)

IN the Interest of C.K., a Minor,
V.K., natural mother, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee.

No. 91-03524.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 10, 1992.

Charles M. Samaha, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Ronald S. Frankel, Victoria E. Mac Intosh of Victoria E. Mac Intosh, P.A., St. Petersburg, and Frank H. Nagatani, Pinellas Park, for appellee.

PATTERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from the termination of her parental rights, V.K. raises seven issues. We find merit in only one and reverse.

Neither the trial court's order terminating parental rights nor the transcript of the proceedings establishes that the court considered or evaluated the factors listed in section 39.467(2)(a)-(k), Florida Statutes (1991), in reaching its determination that the termination of parental rights is in the manifest best interests of the child. Thus, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court conduct further proceedings to consider each factor in section 39.467(2) and render an appropriate written order setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law. See In the Interest of R.J., 586 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The trial court should then reassess whether C.K.'s manifest best interests require the termination of V.K.'s parental rights.

Reversed and remanded.

PARKER, A.C.J., and BENTLEY, E. RANDOLPH, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

T.M. v. Department of Children & Families
788 So. 2d 306 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
K.P. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
617 So. 2d 819 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
601 So. 2d 1331, 1992 WL 157482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-interest-of-ck-fladistctapp-1992.