In Interest of AP
This text of 639 A.2d 1181 (In Interest of AP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Interest of A.P.
Appeal of COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Catherine Marshall, Ronald Eisenberg, Alan Sacks, Philadelphia, for appellant.
John W. Packel, Bradley S. Bridge, Philadelphia, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY and CASTILLE, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.
MONTEMURO, S.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.[*]
PAPADAKOS, J., dissents and would grant an evidentiary hearing.
NOTES
[*] Mr. Justice Frank J. MONTEMURO is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of Mr. Justice LARSEN, see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
639 A.2d 1181, 536 Pa. 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-interest-of-ap-pa-1994.