in Adolfo Serrano
This text of in Adolfo Serrano (in Adolfo Serrano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: In Adolfo Serrano
Appellate case number: 01-22-00734-CV
Trial court case number: 2022-21527
Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County
Relator, Adolfo Serrano, filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asking this Court to vacate the trial court’s order signed on October 4, 2022 granting the motion to compel filed by Quincey Chavis, Individually, and Quincy Chavis A/N/F of B.C. The Court requested a response from real parties but no response was filed. It has come to the Court’s attention that the trial court may have vacated its October 4, 2022 order. If the order challenged in this original proceeding has been vacated, then the original proceeding may be moot. See In re Chaiken, No. 01-21-00200-CV, 2022 WL 3588716, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 23, 2022, orig. proceeding) (dismissing as moot petition for writ of mandamus because orders challenged in petition were vacated). Accordingly, unless relator files a response within 10 days from the date of this order, explaining why this original proceeding is not moot, the Court will dismiss the proceeding as moot. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard Hightower Acting individually
Date: November 8, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Adolfo Serrano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-adolfo-serrano-texapp-2022.