IMPULSORA DE PRODUCTOS SUSTENTABLES S.A.P.I. DE C.V. v. SENEN DANIEL GARCIA
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1928 Lower Tribunal No. 21-10054 ________________
Impulsora de Productos Sustentables S.A.P.I. de C.V., Petitioner,
vs.
Senen Daniel Garcia, et al., Respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge.
Law Office of Alan I. Karten, PLLC, and Alan I. Karten (Boynton Beach), for petitioner.
Kaplan Zeena LLP, and James M. Kaplan, Robin Corwin Campbell, and Maria Kimijima, for respondents.
Before EMAS, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Impulsora de Productos Sustentables S.A.P.I. de C.V.,
seeks review, by means of a petition for certiorari, of a trial court order
staying certain discovery until such time as a viable cause of action is
asserted. Because petitioner has failed to carry its burden of demonstrating
that the order will result in irreparable injury, we dismiss the petition for lack
of jurisdiction. See Villella v. Ansin, 263 So. 3d 823, 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019);
Valencia v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC, 317 So. 3d 178, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA
2021); Damsky v. Univ. of Miami, 152 So. 3d 789, 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
IMPULSORA DE PRODUCTOS SUSTENTABLES S.A.P.I. DE C.V. v. SENEN DANIEL GARCIA (IMPULSORA DE PRODUCTOS SUSTENTABLES S.A.P.I. DE C.V. v. SENEN DANIEL GARCIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.