Importers' & Traders' National Bank v. Perine

4 N.Y. St. Rep. 889
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 889 (Importers' & Traders' National Bank v. Perine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Importers' & Traders' National Bank v. Perine, 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 889 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

Opinion

Pratt, J.

The moving affidavit of appellant does not show that the case was difficult and extraordinary, but on the contrary, only two witnesses were examined, and the only question of fact was whether Christine Ferine had loaned money to her husband, and the amount.

We think the justice at special term used his discretion very much in favor of defendant in granting him taxable costs and disbursements.

The reason given for the decision at special term may not be tenable, but the order was clearly right.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Barnard, P. J., concurs; Dykman, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/importers-traders-national-bank-v-perine-nysupct-1886.