Import Associates of America, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Import Associates of America, Inc. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1080, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3334

DecidedApril 16, 1969

DocketNo. P69/103; protest 63/14388(B) (San Francisco); No. P69/104; protest 66/59333 (New York); No. P69/105; protest 68/15569 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1080 (Import Associates of America, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Import Associates of America, Inc. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1080, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3334 (cusc 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Torch Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein said batteries were held to be separately dutiable and that no separate value for each of said items had been returned by the appraiser, the protests were dismissed and the matter remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement to determine the separate value of the flashlights and batteries in the mamier provided by law (28 U.S.C., section 2636 (d)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Torch Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein said batteries were held to be separately dutiable and that no separate value for each of said items had been returned by the appraiser, the protests were dismissed and the matter remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement to determine the separate value of the flashlights and batteries in the mamier provided by law (28 U.S.C., section 2636 (d)).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Cust. Ct. 1080, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/import-associates-of-america-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack