Imperial Woolen Co. v. Miller

Third Circuit

Imperial Woolen Co. v. Miller

183 F. 578, 106 C.C.A. 122, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5164

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedNovember 28, 1910

DocketNo. 1,398 (23)

StatusPublished

This text of 183 F. 578 (Imperial Woolen Co. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Imperial Woolen Co. v. Miller, 183 F. 578, 106 C.C.A. 122, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5164 (3d Cir. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error says that three questions are presented by the assignments of error: (1) Whether the minor, George Miller, was directed to oil the machinery while it was in motion; (2) whether he was adequately instructed; and (3) whether he was furnished with unsafe tools and appliances. This is a fair statement of the questions involved. There was abundant evidence on each of them to oblige the court to submit the case to the jury.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error says that three questions are presented by the assignments of error: (1) Whether the minor, George Miller, was directed to oil the machinery while it was in motion; (2) whether he was adequately instructed; and (3) whether he was furnished with unsafe tools and appliances. This is a fair statement of the questions involved. There was abundant evidence on each of them to oblige the court to submit the case to the jury.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 F. 578, 106 C.C.A. 122, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imperial-woolen-co-v-miller-ca3-1910.