Imperial v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Imperial v. Phillips

248 A.D. 775

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order consolidating actions affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The court understands -pro rata to mean one-fourth, there now being four plaintiffs. Although the court disposes of tills matter in order to save further time and expense, the motion should have been made in New York county. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order consolidating actions affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The court understands -pro rata to mean one-fourth, there now being four plaintiffs. Although the court disposes of tills matter in order to save further time and expense, the motion should have been made in New York county. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Imperial v. Phillips, 248 A.D. 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 775 (Imperial v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.