Imperial Terrace East Homeowner's Ass'n. v. Grimes

649 So. 2d 301, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 295, 1995 WL 19540
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1995·No. No. 94-5·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our previous opinion and substitute the following:

The final summary judgement of foreclosure is affirmed except for the denial of costs and attorney’s fees requested by the appellant association. Because we have affirmed the actions of the trial court we find it unnecessary to accept the invitation to discuss the other points raised in the appeal and cross-appeal. The trial court relied upon the Declaration of Restrictions when it allowed the foreclosure of the lien for assessments. The Declaration also provided for attorney’s fees to be awarded to the prevailing party in foreclosure and the provision was non-discretionary. If any provisions of the Declaration are to be enforced, all must be enforced.

We remand for an award of fees and costs to the prevailing party.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Imperial Terrace East Homeowner's Ass'n. v. Grimes, 649 So. 2d 301, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 295, 1995 WL 19540 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

649 So. 2d 301 (Imperial Terrace East Homeowner's Ass'n. v. Grimes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PELICAN BAY HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. Sedita
724 So. 2d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
IMPERIAL TERRACE EAST v. Grimes
666 So. 2d 276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)