Imperial Lumber Co. v. James Knowles, Inc.
267 So. 2d 53
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1972·No. No. 72-308·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
We have examined the record, the briefs and particularly the final judgment entered by the trial judge and note that the judgment comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness. We observe that appellate courts cannot substitute their judgment for that of the trial court and no reversible error having been made to appear the judgment is therefore affirmed, including paragraph six of the final judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Imperial Lumber Co. v. James Knowles, Inc., 267 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
267 So. 2d 53 (Imperial Lumber Co. v. James Knowles, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horatio Enterprises, Inc. v. Rabin
614 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Banco Do Brasil v. City Nat. Bank
609 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.
349 So. 2d 1187 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Villa v. Mumac Construction Corp.
334 So. 2d 274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
La Rossa v. Glynn
302 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Benedict v. Dade County Realty, Inc.
274 So. 2d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)