Imperial Life Ins. v. Newcomb

63 F. 560, 11 C.C.A. 340, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2422
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Imperial Life Ins. v. Newcomb. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 F. 97
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 10, 1894·No. No. 343·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion for a rehearing in this case (62 Fed. 97)1 is made upon the ground that the court has not considered the sufficiency of the statement of the! cause of action in the complaint, and of the record, to sustain the judgment. If we concede that these questions were properly presented the motion must still be denied, because they were both considered and'decided adversely to the plaintiff in error at the hearing, and the opinion clearly states that the opinion of the circuit court overruling the demurrer was approved, and that no just exception to the report of the referee was taken. The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Imperial Life Ins. v. Newcomb, 63 F. 560, 11 C.C.A. 340, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2422 (8th Cir. 1894).

63 F. 560 (Imperial Life Ins. v. Newcomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ontai v. United States
188 F. 310 (Ninth Circuit, 1911)
Imperial Life Ins. v. Newcomb
62 F. 97 (Eighth Circuit, 1894)