Imperial International Corp. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 329
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 27, 1968
DocketC.D. 3377
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 329 (Imperial International Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Imperial International Corp. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 329 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

The suits listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted on a written stipulation reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:
1. That the items marked “A”, and initialed GHL, JOB, JS (Import Specialists Initials) by Import Specialists Geo. H. Little-john, J. O’Brien, J. Sollazzo (Import Specialists’ Names) on the invoices covered by the protests enumerated on Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, and assessed with duty at the rate of 15% ad valorem under Par. 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, as articles in chief value of metal, suitable for controlling, distributing, modifying, producing, or rectifying electrical energy, consist of earphones, which are not suitable for controlling, distributing, modifying, producing, or rectifying electrical energy.
2. That said earphones are in chief value of metal, and have as an essential feature an electrical element.
3. That the rate applicable to articles in chief value of metal, and having as an essential feature an electrical element is in paragraph 353 and was modified by T.D. 55615 and T.D. 55816 to 12.5% ad valorem as to entries made between July 1, 1962 and June 30, 1963, [330]*330and to 11.5% ad valorem as to entries made between July 1, 1963, and August 30,1963.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the protests enumerated on Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof be submitted on this stipulation, said protests being limited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid.

Accepting the foregoing stipulation of facts, we find and hold the items of merchandise, marked “A” and initialed on the invoices by the designated import specialists, to be properly dutiable as articles in chief value of metal, having as an essential feature an electrical element, at the rate of 12.5 per centum ad valorem, or 11.5 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 55615 and T.D. 55816, depending upon date of entry.

To the extent indicated the specified claim in these suits is sustained; in all other respects and as to all other merchandise all the claims are overruled.

Judgment will 'be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imperial-international-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1968.