Imperial Fire Insurance v. City & County of Denver

51 Colo. 456
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1911
DocketNo. 6768
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 51 Colo. 456 (Imperial Fire Insurance v. City & County of Denver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Imperial Fire Insurance v. City & County of Denver, 51 Colo. 456 (Colo. 1911).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gabbert

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff’s sole contention is, that its personal property is exempt from taxation by the county authorities by virtue of the “provisions of section 16 above quoted. Section 10 of Article X of our constitution is as follows:

“All corporations in this state or doing business therein, shall be subject to taxation for state, coúnty, school, municipal and other purposes on the real and personal property owned or used by them within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax.”

The act in question undertakes to exempt insurance companies from the payment of taxes levied by the authorities and for the purposes contemplated by this section. The taxes realized under section 16 of the act are retained by the state. If the exemption is upheld, it relieves insurance companies from paying their just and fair proportion of taxes which may be levied by county authorities for state, county, school, municipal and other purposes, and deprives the various subdivisions of the state from receiving the taxes which such authorities are authorized to levy for their benefit upon the personal property of insurance companies owned by them within the territorial limits of the authorities levying such taxes. The constitution inhibits such exemptions and inhibitions. To the extent, then, at least, that the act undertakes to exempt the personal property of insurance companies from [459]*459taxation, by county authorities, for other than state purposes, it is invalid.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Decision en banc. Judgment affirmed.

Chief Justice Campbell not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

No.
Colorado Attorney General Reports, 1991
City & County of Denver v. Security Life & Accident Co.
477 P.2d 369 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1970)
City of Denver v. Tax Research Bureau
71 P.2d 809 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)
Colorado National Life Assurance Co. v. Clayton
130 P. 330 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Colo. 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imperial-fire-insurance-v-city-county-of-denver-colo-1911.