Imperato v. Concord Casualty and Surety Co.
171 A. 795, 112 N.J.L. 503, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 304
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Imperato v. Concord Casualty and Surety Co., 171 A. 795, 112 N.J.L. 503, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1934).
171 A. 795 (Imperato v. Concord Casualty and Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.