Imperati v. Lee

132 A.D.3d 591, 18 N.Y.S.3d 615
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 29, 2015
Docket16008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 132 A.D.3d 591 (Imperati v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Imperati v. Lee, 132 A.D.3d 591, 18 N.Y.S.3d 615 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered on or about March 14, 2014, which granted so much *592 of plaintiffs motion as sought to amend the complaint to add a cause of action for wrongful death, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

The court improperly granted plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint to include a cause of action for wrongful death, as the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient. “A motion seeking leave to amend a personal injury complaint to assert a cause of action for wrongful death must be supported by competent medical proof of the causal connection between the alleged malpractice and the death of the original plaintiff” (McGuire v Small, 129 AD2d 429, 429 [1st Dept 1987]; see also Cruz v Brown, 129 AD3d 455 [1st Dept 2015]). The record shows that plaintiffs decedent suffered from numerous serious ailments prior to the alleged malpractice, and did not die until nearly two years after the alleged malpractice, following a number of other procedures performed by nondefendants and while in the care of other nondefendants for those two years. Plaintiffs counsel’s conclusory assertion of causation, contained in his affirmation in support of the motion, was insufficient to establish a causal connection between the decedent’s death and the originally alleged malpractice by defendants (see Griffin v New York City Tr. Auth., 1 AD3d 141 [1st Dept 2003]).

Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jensen v. United States
E.D. New York, 2025
Matter of Bynum v. Camp Bisco, LLC
2017 NY Slip Op 8433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.D.3d 591, 18 N.Y.S.3d 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imperati-v-lee-nyappdiv-2015.