Impellizzeri v. Impellizzeri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Impellizzeri v. Impellizzeri

285 A.D. 898, 137 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6048

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1955

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 A.D. 898 (Impellizzeri v. Impellizzeri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Impellizzeri v. Impellizzeri, 285 A.D. 898, 137 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1944. After a separation agreement was entered into in 1952, disposing of the property rights of the parties, defendant went to Nevada, obtained a divorce, remarried, and is now living in New Jersey with his second wife. In this action to declare the Nevada divorce decree invalid and that plaintiff is the lawful wife of defendant, the latter appeals from a resettled order denying his motion to dismiss the amended complaint made on the ground that the court does not have and should not exercise jurisdiction. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Baumann v. Baumann, 222 App. Div. 460; 250 N. T. 382.) Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1944. After a separation agreement was entered into in 1952, disposing of the property rights of the parties, defendant went to Nevada, obtained a divorce, remarried, and is now living in New Jersey with his second wife. In this action to declare the Nevada divorce decree invalid and that plaintiff is the lawful wife of defendant, the latter appeals from a resettled order denying his motion to dismiss the amended complaint made on the ground that the court does not have and should not exercise jurisdiction. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Baumann v. Baumann, 222 App. Div. 460; 250 N. T. 382.) Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 898, 137 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/impellizzeri-v-impellizzeri-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack