IMO Simmons
This text of IMO Simmons (IMO Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE MATTER OF THE § No. 184, 2020 PETITION OF ERIC BERNARD § SIMMONS FOR A WRIT OF § PROHIBITION §
Submitted: July 9, 2020 Decided: July 10, 2020
Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the petition for a writ of prohibition and the answer and
motion to dismiss, it appears to the Court that:
(1) The petitioner, Eric Bernard Simmons, was convicted of various drug,
weapons, and traffic offenses and sentenced in September 2017 to ten years of
unsuspended Level V imprisonment, among other penalties. Simmons now seeks to
invoke the original jurisdiction of this Court, under Supreme Court Rule 43, to issue
a writ of prohibition to the Superior Court. His petition for a writ of prohibition
asserts that the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the charges against
him, and his convictions are null and void, because he is “a private man and not a
person” as defined in the Delaware Code. He contends that the General Assembly
intended the word “person” as used in Titles 11, 16 and 21 of the Delaware Code to
mean “artificial commercial entities.” (2) A writ of prohibition is the legal equivalent of the equitable remedy of
an injunction.1 Its purpose is to keep a trial court within the limits of its own
jurisdiction.2
(3) Simmons has not shown that he is entitled to the issuance of a writ of
prohibition. Contrary to his assertion, “person” as defined in Title 11 includes,
among other things, “a human being who has been born and is alive.”3 Similarly,
the definitions of “person” in Titles 16 and 21 include an “individual.”4 The petition
must therefore be dismissed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
prohibition is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice
1 In re Hovey, 545 A.2d 626, 628 (Del. 1988). 2 Id. 3 11 Del. C. § 222(21). 4 16 Del. C. § 4701(35); 21 Del. C. § 101(53). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
IMO Simmons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imo-simmons-del-2020.