IMO Derious Johnson

Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided March 31, 2021·No. 77, 2021·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF DERIOUS § JOHNSON FOR A WRIT OF § No. 77, 2021 HABEAS CORPUS §

Submitted: March 24, 2021 Decided: March 31, 2021

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that:

(1) On March 11, 2021, Derious Johnson filed a document entitled “Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum.” Johnson’s document was docketed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

(2) On March 11, 2021, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Johnson to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed for this Court’s lack of original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus. On March 24, 2021, Johnson filed a response to the notice to show cause. Johnson’s response does not address the jurisdictional issue raised in the notice.

(3) It is well-settled that this Court has no original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus.1 Accordingly, Johnson’s petition manifestly fails on its face

1 In re Cantrell, 678 A.2d 525, 526 (Del. 1996).

to invoke the original jurisdiction of the Court, and it must be dismissed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED under Supreme Court Rule 29(b) that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IMO Derious Johnson, (Del. 2021).

IMO Derious Johnson (IMO Derious Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Cantrell
678 A.2d 525 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1996)