Imley v. Beard
6 Cal. 666
This text of 6 Cal. 666 (Imley v. Beard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Imley v. Beard, 6 Cal. 666 (Cal. 1856).
Opinion
Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt concurred.
The judgment of non-suit having been entered on motion of the plaintiff, an appeal does not lie in his favor. See 5 Blackford, 168; 6 ib., 55; 4 Wheat., 73.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.
262 Cal. App. 2d 367 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)
Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. Waymire
92 P. 645 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
Schulte v. Kelly
83 N.W. 405 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1900)
Allard v. Smith
73 N.W. 50 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1897)
City & County San Francisco v. Certain Real Estate
42 Cal. 513 (California Supreme Court, 1872)
Sleeper v. Kelly
22 Cal. 456 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imley-v-beard-cal-1856.