Imhof v. New York CIty Housing Authority
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : JOHN IMHOF, : : Plaintiff, : : 23 Civ. 1880 (JPC) -v- : : ORDER NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY et al., : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: The Court will hear oral argument on Defendant Daniel Sherrod’s motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 105, at 4:00 p.m. on May 27, 2025, in Courtroom 12D at 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. The parties should be prepared to thoroughly discuss the following issues: 1. The relevance, if any, of the Supreme Court’s analysis in Davis v. Passman to Sherrod’s argument that the Rehabilitation Act preempts Plaintiff John Imhof’s claims against Sherrod under the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”). 442 U.S. 228, 247 (1979) (“There is no evidence . . . that Congress meant [Section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964] to foreclose alternative remedies available to those not covered by the statute.”); see also Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 833 (1976) (holding that Section 717 of the Civil Rights Act is the exclusive remedy for race discrimination claims in the federal employment context); Rivera v. Heyman, 157 F.3d 101, 105 (2d Cir. 1998) (extending Brown’s preemption logic to state and city law discrimination claims alleging disability discrimination covered by Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, and applying Brown to claims against federal employees in their individual capacity). 2. Whether Imhof’s claims against Sherrod under the NYCHRL are covered under the plain language of the Westfall Act’s exclusivity provision, including whether those claims are “for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death” and arise or result from a “negligent or wrongful act or omission.” 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1). In addition, the parties may (but are not required to) submit simultaneous supplemental briefs of no more than 5,000 words each addressing these issues on or before May 23, 2025. SO ORDERED. Wes Dated: May 2, 2025 Vlhof12 New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Imhof v. New York CIty Housing Authority (Imhof v. New York CIty Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.