Imery v. Vangil Ingenieros
This text of Imery v. Vangil Ingenieros (Imery v. Vangil Ingenieros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 8, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D14-2903 Lower Tribunal No. 11-36622 ________________
Gilberto Jesus Imery, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Vangil Ingenieros, etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa I. Rodriguez, Judge.
Brian Barakat, for appellants.
Dorta & Ortega, and Omar Ortega and Aileen J. Martin, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD, LAGOA and EMAS, JJ.
SHEPHERD, J. Gilberto Jesus Imery and Ivan Carrero Gaivis appeal from an order denying
their motion to dismiss a third amended complaint on grounds of forum non
conveniens. Because the record is insufficient to determine whether the trial court
performed the analysis required by Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Insurance
Co., 674 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1996), we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
See Levinson & Litchtman, LLP v. Levinson, 35 So. 3d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010);
Wood v. Bluestone, 9 So. 3d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Imery v. Vangil Ingenieros, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imery-v-vangil-ingenieros-fladistctapp-2015.