Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Imery v. Ingenieros

Imery v. Ingenieros

167 So. 3d 523, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10359, 2015 WL 4111334
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 2015
DocketNo. 3D14-2903
StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 3d 523 (Imery v. Ingenieros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Imery v. Ingenieros, 167 So. 3d 523, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10359, 2015 WL 4111334 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

SHEPHERD, J.

Gilberto Jesus Imery and Ivan Carrero Gaivis appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss a third amended complaint on grounds of forum non conve-niens. Because the record is insufficient to determine whether the trial court performed the analysis required by Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Insurance Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996), we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Levinson & Litchtman, LLP v. Levinson, 35 So.3d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Wood v. Bluestone, 9 So.3d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LEVINSON & LICHTMAN, LLP v. Levinson
35 So. 3d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co.
674 So. 2d 86 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Wood v. Bluestone
9 So. 3d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 So. 3d 523, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10359, 2015 WL 4111334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imery-v-ingenieros-fladistctapp-2015.