Imc Mortgage Company v. Pettway, No. Cv98 035 45 60 (May 7, 1999)
This text of 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6355 (Imc Mortgage Company v. Pettway, No. Cv98 035 45 60 (May 7, 1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Second Special Defense. Granted. The failure to allege that the plaintiff knew the appraisal to be untrue constitutes a fatal omission of one of the essential elements of the tort of intentional misrepresentation. Paiva v. Vanech HeightsConstruction Co.
Third Special Defense. Denied. The acts described relate to the making enforcement and validity of the note because if the sale and consequently the mortgage were induced by false misrepresentations upon which the defendant relied, then the transaction may be held to have been invalid in the making.Boretz v. Segar
MOTTOLESE, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imc-mortgage-company-v-pettway-no-cv98-035-45-60-may-7-1999-connsuperct-1999.