Imbrunone v. State

793 So. 2d 96, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11426, 2001 WL 912821
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 2001·No. No. 2D01-1464·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Aaron Imbrunone appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Imbrunone styled his submission as a motion to correct illegal sentence, but he filed it pursuant to rule 3.850, met the pleading requirements of rule 3.850, and sought relief only available pursuant to rule 3.850. The circuit court, noting that the motion sought relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000), treated the motion as one filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a) and denied it. We affirm without comment the denial of Im-brunone’s claim that he is entitled to Heggs resentencing. However, the circuit court failed to address the portion of the motion in which Imbrunone sought to withdraw his original plea. That aspect of the motion was facially sufficient. We reverse and remand for the circuit court to consider it.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

FULMER, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Imbrunone v. State, 793 So. 2d 96, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11426, 2001 WL 912821 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

793 So. 2d 96 (Imbrunone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nunez v. State
793 So. 2d 96 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)