Imamoto v. Kahi Mohala Hospital
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-30065
05-JUN-2013
11:56 AM
SCWC-30065
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
WILLARD M. IMAMOTO, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL, NAOMI MORGAN, DUDLEY AKAMA, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30065; CIV. NO. 06-1-2068)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for certiorari was filed, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2011); see also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Plaintiff-
Appellant Willard M. Imamoto’s application for writ of certiorari, filed May 28, 2013, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2012) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the
filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 5, 2013.
Willard M. Imamoto, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner, pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Imamoto v. Kahi Mohala Hospital (Imamoto v. Kahi Mohala Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.