Imami v. University of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Imami v. University of Florida

875 So. 2d 1255, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7058, 2004 WL 1123482

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 21, 2004

DocketNo. 1D03-5006

StatusPublished

This text of 875 So. 2d 1255 (Imami v. University of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Imami v. University of Florida, 875 So. 2d 1255, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7058, 2004 WL 1123482 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of December 18, 2003, and February 19, 2004, the Court has determined that the April 13, 2004, letter does not constitute a final order as defined by section 120.52(7), Florida Statutes, because it has not been filed with the agency clerk. See Hill v. Division of Retirement, 687 So.2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (describing the essential attributes of reviewable final orders entered under the Administrative Procedure Act, including filing of order with agency clerk). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BOOTH, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of December 18, 2003, and February 19, 2004, the Court has determined that the April 13, 2004, letter does not constitute a final order as defined by section 120.52(7), Florida Statutes, because it has not been filed with the agency clerk. See Hill v. Division of Retirement, 687 So.2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (describing the essential attributes of reviewable final orders entered under the Administrative Procedure Act, including filing of order with agency clerk). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BOOTH, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

875 So. 2d 1255, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7058, 2004 WL 1123482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imami-v-university-of-florida-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack