Home/Court of Claims of Illinois/Image Response v. State

Image Response v. State

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 209, 1978 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 43
CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois
DecidedApril 7, 1978
DocketNo. 77-CC-0661
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 209 (Image Response v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Image Response v. State, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 209, 1978 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 43 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1978).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having come before the Court on the motion of Respondent, and Claimant having failed to respond, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, find that the Claimant, as set forth in Respondent’ s motion to dismiss, failed to attach the contract for services and the joining of two separate agencies in the same complaint is in violation of Rule 5(c) and Rule 5(d)(3) respectively, therefore, this claim should be dismissed according to Rule 9 of the Court of Claims.

It is therefore ordered that this claim be, and the same is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Talandis Construction Corp. v. State
35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 234 (Court of Claims of Illinois, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 209, 1978 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/image-response-v-state-ilclaimsct-1978.