Ilva Nichole Greenidge v. Kevin Antony Greenidge

Opinion

02-10-175-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00175-CV

ILVA NICHOLE GREENIDGE

APPELLANT

V.

KEVIN ANTONY GREENIDGE

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 360TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

          On September 7, 2010, we notified Appellant Ilva Nichole Greenidge that her brief did not comply with state appellate rules 9.4(h) and 38.1(a), (c), (d), (f), (g), (i), (j), and (k),[2] nor did it comply with subsections A and E of this court’s local appellate rule 1.[3]  We allowed Appellant until September 17, 2010, to file an amended brief that complied with the above rules.  We stated in our letter to Appellant that her failure to timely file an amended brief in compliance with the above rules could result in the waiver of noncomplying points, our striking her brief, or the dismissal of her appeal.[4]  Appellant has not filed an amended brief.

          Accordingly, we strike Appellant’s brief and dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.[5]

                                                                             PER CURIAM

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  October 14, 2010

---

[1]See Tex. R. App. 47.4.

[2]See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(h), 38.1(a), (c), (d), (f), (g), (i)-(k).

[3]See 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 1(A), (E).

[4]See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), (c).

[5]See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), (c).