Ilott v. Deibert
This text of 19 Misc. 2d 564 (Ilott v. Deibert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The courts have consistently held that statutes changing a Statute of Limitations [State Residential Rent Law, § 11, subd. 5; L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd. by L. 1957, ch. 755] will not be given retroactive effect unless such legislative intent is clearly shown (People v. Cohen, 245 N. Y. 419; cf. Robinson v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co., 238 N. Y. 271).
The judgment and order so far as appealed from should be modified to the extent of limiting the recovery to the period commencing July 1, 1957, and as modified affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.
Judgment modified, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Misc. 2d 564, 195 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ilott-v-deibert-nyappterm-1959.