Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Termax Co.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• Decided: March 8, 2023
• Docket: 23-1252
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-1252 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 03/08/2023

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC., Appellant

v.

TERMAX COMPANY, Cross-Appellant ______________________

2023-1252, 2023-1254 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 00724. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________

Before DYK, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER Illinois Tool Works, Inc. moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal, No. 2023-1252, and to dismiss Termax Com- pany’s cross-appeal, No. 2023-1254. Termax opposes dis- missal of its cross-appeal. We grant both motions. Case: 23-1252 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 03/08/2023

Termax appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s final written decision in this inter partes review, which agreed with Termax that all challenged claims of Il- linois Tool Works’ U.S. Patent No. 10,683,882 are un- patentable. We have employed the familiar rule that “the prevailing party in a lower tribunal cannot ordinarily seek relief in the appellate court” to appeals from the Board. SkyHawke Techs., LLC v. Deca Int’l Corp., 828 F.3d 1373, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (citation omitted). We see nothing that warrants departing from that rule here. In opposing dismissal, Termax contends that the Board erred in its construction of certain claim limitations that have also been incorporated into Illinois Tool Works’ new patent. Termax hopes that a favorable decision on its claim construction arguments here will collaterally estop Illinois Tool Works from asserting those newly issued claims. But in SkyHawke, we rejected a similar attempt to appeal from a Board’s claim construction when the appellant did “not seek to alter the judgment of the Board.” Id. There, as here, Termax “is merely trying to preempt an unfavorable outcome” as to some other potential proceeding regarding Illinois Tool Works’ new patent “that may or may not arise in the future,” and, if such an outcome does arise, Termax may appeal “at that time.” Id. at 1377. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motions are granted, and the appeals are dis- missed. Case: 23-1252 Document: 30 Page: 3 Filed: 03/08/2023

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC. v. TERMAX CO. 3

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT

March 8, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to Appeal No. 2023-1252 only): March 8, 2023