Illinois Surety Co. v. Miller

242 U.S. 614, 37 S. Ct. 112, 61 L. Ed. 528, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1409
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 1916·No. No. 82·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with five per cent damages, upon the authority of Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 331; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S. 519; Union Trust Co. v. Westhus, 228 U. S. 379; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412. Mr. L. Laflin Kellogg and Mr. Nelson L. Keach for the appellant. Mr. H. W. Goodrich, Mr. Arthur M. Allen, Mr. George R. Coughlan, Mr., George W. Bristol, Mr. Henry E. Mattison and Mr. Frederick P. King for the appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Illinois Surety Co. v. Miller, 242 U.S. 614, 37 S. Ct. 112, 61 L. Ed. 528, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1409 (1916).

242 U.S. 614 (Illinois Surety Co. v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Macaboy v. United States
160 F.2d 279 (D.C. Circuit, 1947)
Tucker v. State
1939 OK CR 72 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1939)