Illinois Surety Co. v. Miller
This text of 242 U.S. 614 (Illinois Surety Co. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with five per cent damages, upon the authority of Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 331; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S. 519; Union Trust Co. v. Westhus, 228 U. S. 379; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412. Mr. L. Laflin Kellogg and Mr. Nelson L. Keach for the appellant. Mr. H. W. Goodrich, Mr. Arthur M. Allen, Mr. George R. Coughlan, Mr., George W. Bristol, Mr. Henry E. Mattison and Mr. Frederick P. King for the appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 U.S. 614, 37 S. Ct. 112, 61 L. Ed. 528, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/illinois-surety-co-v-miller-scotus-1916.