Home/Supreme Court/Illinois Protestant Children's Home v. Department of Public Welfare

Illinois Protestant Children's Home v. Department of Public Welfare

372 U.S. 967, 83 S. Ct. 1092, 10 L. Ed. 2d 130, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1844
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 15, 1963·No. No. 860·Published·Cited by 65 cases

Opinion

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Illinois Protestant Children's Home v. Department of Public Welfare, 372 U.S. 967, 83 S. Ct. 1092, 10 L. Ed. 2d 130, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1844 (1963).

372 U.S. 967 (Illinois Protestant Children's Home v. Department of Public Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Baines
84 P.3d 245 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Liss
2000 MT 380 (Montana Supreme Court, 2000)
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Fullerton
118 F.3d 374 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Fullerton
118 F.3d 374 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
State v. Powdrill
684 So. 2d 350 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
Bates v. Jones
904 F. Supp. 1080 (N.D. California, 1995)
Sibert v. Phelan
901 F. Supp. 183 (D. New Jersey, 1995)
State v. Gonzalez
641 A.2d 1060 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Almario M. Aviles v. Meris Laboratories
974 F.2d 1341 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Jones
596 A.2d 414 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)
Orduna S.A. And Transglobal Maritime Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees-Cross-Appellees v. Zen-Noh Grain Corporation, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. F & P Engineers, Inc., Republic Insurance Company and Employers Insurance Company of Wausau, Third Party Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
913 F.2d 1149 (Third Circuit, 1990)
Orduna S.A. v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp.
913 F.2d 1149 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
New Hampshire Insurance Group v. Strecker
798 P.2d 130 (Montana Supreme Court, 1990)
Ayers v. City of Richmond
895 F.2d 1267 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Gregory Romel Ayers, and Wayne Johnson, Esq., Counsel for the v. City of Richmond Ernest Clements, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Richmond James Fales, Individually and in His Capacity as City Manager for the City of Richmond Walter Trujillo, of the Richmond Police Department and Officers of the Richmond Police Department Whose Names Have Not Yet Been Ascertained, Inclusive, Individually and in Their Capacity as Officers of the Richmond Police Department for the City of Richmond and Does 1-100, Inclusive, Gregory Romel Ayers v. City of Richmond Ernest Clements, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Richmond James Fales, Individually and in His Capacity as City Manager for the City of Richmond Walter Trujillo, of the Richmond Police Department and Officers of the Richmond Police Department Whose Names Have Not Yet Been Ascertained, Inclusive, Individually and in Their Capacity as Officers of the Richmond Police Department for the City of Richmond and Does 1-100, Inclusive
895 F.2d 1267 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Rymer v. Hagler
211 Cal. App. 3d 1171 (California Court of Appeal, 1989)
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Traci Bomke
849 F.2d 1218 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
People v. Bradney
525 N.E.2d 112 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1988)
Villers Seafood Co., Inc. v. Vest
813 F.2d 339 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
Villers Seafood Co. v. Vest
813 F.2d 339 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)