Illinois Land & Loan Co. v. McCormick

61 Ill. 322
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1871·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Appellant and other defendants in the court below were served with summons by a special deputy.

The statute, which authorizes the appointment of a special deputy, requires that the appointment shall be indorsed upon or attached to the summons, and shall be signed by the sheriff. Gross, (1869) 718. The law clearly intends a written appointment.

The record before us shows that the sheriff did not comply with the statute, and the service by the deputy was without proper authority.

After the record was filed in this court, and errors assigned, the decree was amended in the court below, at a term' subsequent to the one at which it was rendered, so as to exclude appellant from its force.

This practice was irregular, and should not have been permitted ; and, in this instance, we must decide upon the original record.

The decree is reversed and the cause remanded.

Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Illinois Land & Loan Co. v. McCormick, 61 Ill. 322 (Ill. 1871).

61 Ill. 322 (Illinois Land & Loan Co. v. McCormick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the County Treasurer & Ex Officio County Collector
717 N.E.2d 530 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1999)
Bank of Union v. Loeb
76 S.E. 883 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1912)
Reedy v. Millizen
40 N.E. 1028 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1895)
Davis v. Hamilton
53 Ill. App. 94 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)
Dunham v. South Park Commissioners
87 Ill. 185 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1877)