Illinois Insurance Exchange v. Scottsdale Insurance
696 So. 2d 1185, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 424, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1016, 1997 WL 380670
Opinions
We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Illinois Insurance Exchange v. Scottsdale Insurance Co., 679 So.2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), based upon conflict jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After hearing oral argument, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and accordingly dismiss the petition.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Illinois Insurance Exchange v. Scottsdale Insurance, 696 So. 2d 1185, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 424, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1016, 1997 WL 380670 (Fla. 1997).
696 So. 2d 1185 (Illinois Insurance Exchange v. Scottsdale Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Continental Cas. Co. v. United Pacific Ins. Co.
637 So. 2d 270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Illinois Ins. Exchange v. SCOTTSDALE INS.
679 So. 2d 355 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)