Illinois Insurance Exchange v. Scottsdale Insurance

696 So. 2d 1185, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 424, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1016, 1997 WL 380670
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 1997
DocketNo. 89124
StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 1185 (Illinois Insurance Exchange v. Scottsdale Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Illinois Insurance Exchange v. Scottsdale Insurance, 696 So. 2d 1185, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 424, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1016, 1997 WL 380670 (Fla. 1997).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Illinois Insurance Exchange v. Scottsdale Insurance Co., 679 So.2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), based upon conflict jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After hearing oral argument, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and accordingly dismiss the petition.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Cas. Co. v. United Pacific Ins. Co.
637 So. 2d 270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Illinois Ins. Exchange v. SCOTTSDALE INS.
679 So. 2d 355 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 1185, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 424, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1016, 1997 WL 380670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/illinois-insurance-exchange-v-scottsdale-insurance-fla-1997.