Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co. v. Heinsen

187 Ill. App. 443
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided July 2, 1914·No. Gen. No. 19,917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and error, § 833*—jurisdiction of court to extend time for filing hill of exceptions. Where the time for filing a bill of exceptions is extended by an order of court, the court after the expiration of time allowed has no jurisdiction to enter a nunc pro tunc order so as to extend the time previously allowed for filing. 3. Appeal and error, §' 952*—when affidavits cannot he considered on motion to strike hill of exceptions. On motion to strike a bill of exceptions from the files upon the ground that it was not filed in time, affidavits presented by counsel for appellant for the purpose of showing that failure to file was not due to the fault of appellant cannot be considered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co. v. Heinsen, 187 Ill. App. 443 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

187 Ill. App. 443 (Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co. v. Heinsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zbinden v. DeMoulin
243 Ill. App. 509 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)