Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co. v. Heinsen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co. v. Heinsen

187 Ill. App. 443

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJuly 2, 1914

DocketGen. No. 19,917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 Ill. App. 443 (Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co. v. Heinsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co. v. Heinsen, 187 Ill. App. 443 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and error, § 833*—jurisdiction of court to extend time for filing hill of exceptions. Where the time for filing a bill of exceptions is extended by an order of court, the court after the expiration of time allowed has no jurisdiction to enter a nunc pro tunc order so as to extend the time previously allowed for filing. 3. Appeal and error, §' 952*—when affidavits cannot he considered on motion to strike hill of exceptions. On motion to strike a bill of exceptions from the files upon the ground that it was not filed in time, affidavits presented by counsel for appellant for the purpose of showing that failure to file was not due to the fault of appellant cannot be considered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and error, § 833*—jurisdiction of court to extend time for filing hill of exceptions. Where the time for filing a bill of exceptions is extended by an order of court, the court after the expiration of time allowed has no jurisdiction to enter a nunc pro tunc order so as to extend the time previously allowed for filing. 3. Appeal and error, §' 952*—when affidavits cannot he considered on motion to strike hill of exceptions. On motion to strike a bill of exceptions from the files upon the ground that it was not filed in time, affidavits presented by counsel for appellant for the purpose of showing that failure to file was not due to the fault of appellant cannot be considered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 Ill. App. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/illinois-improvement-ballast-co-v-heinsen-illappct-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack