Illinois ex rel. Canal Commissioners v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co.
235 U.S. 689, 35 S. Ct. 205
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Illinois ex rel. Canal Commissioners v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co., 235 U.S. 689, 35 S. Ct. 205 (1914).
235 U.S. 689 (Illinois ex rel. Canal Commissioners v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Brewer
231 U.S. 245 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.
233 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1914)