Illinois Collieries Co. v. Haveron

Appellate Court of Illinois

Illinois Collieries Co. v. Haveron

137 Ill. App. 22, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 737

DecidedSeptember 13, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 137 Ill. App. 22 (Illinois Collieries Co. v. Haveron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Illinois Collieries Co. v. Haveron, 137 Ill. App. 22, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 737 (Ill. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

All the controlling facts in this ease except the name of appellee are identical with the case of Illinois Collieries Company v. George Davis, ante, p. 15. Appellee here is the Arthur Haveron mentioned in that case as being engaged as a eo-shotfirer with George Davis, the appellee in that ease, at the time of his injury..

All that we have said in our opinion in that case applies to this.

In the record of this case, as in that, we find no substantial error. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

All the controlling facts in this ease except the name of appellee are identical with the case of Illinois Collieries Company v. George Davis, ante, p. 15. Appellee here is the Arthur Haveron mentioned in that case as being engaged as a eo-shotfirer with George Davis, the appellee in that ease, at the time of his injury..

All that we have said in our opinion in that case applies to this.

In the record of this case, as in that, we find no substantial error. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 Ill. App. 22, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/illinois-collieries-co-v-haveron-illappct-1907.